A330 vs. B767
#21
Posted 25 January 2012 - 09:42 PM
#22
Posted 26 January 2012 - 04:08 PM
#23
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:54 PM
#24
Posted 26 January 2012 - 10:39 PM
#25
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:02 AM
Once the 787 is launched I tend to just replace A330-200/300's with B787-8/9 with no issues but I'll often still snap up some cheap A330's in the used market for quick expansion since B787's always seem to have a long waiting list
#26
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:52 AM
Once the 787 is launched I tend to just replace A330-200/300's with B787-8/9 with no issues
Same here. 787 is d perfect replacement for A330 ! Though it will continue to b d next best option.
#27
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:25 AM
#28
Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:08 AM
#29
Posted 15 April 2012 - 12:37 AM
#30
Guest_jackjfh1_*
Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:52 PM
#31
Posted 15 May 2012 - 03:55 PM
I like to have both - there's never enough widebody capacity
can't agree more!!
Members of Smile Group (Previously as Air Developing)
#32
Posted 15 July 2012 - 04:38 AM
Boeing Planes are usually made better.
I agree with that but sometimes it is still better to go with airbus.
Proud to have all Boeing fleets.
#33
Posted 23 October 2016 - 01:48 AM
I operate a300-600s and 767-200/200ER/300s, should i replace them with a330s when a330 come out?
#34
Posted 25 October 2016 - 01:34 AM
I usually just get what I think my airline livery would look best on, but I tend to prefer the 767 when my airline is in the US and the A330 when my airline is elsewhere.
#35
Posted 26 October 2016 - 07:33 PM
Airbus is far better than Boeing.
Airbus does not have the experiences as boeing does, but boeing does not have the collaboration that airbus does. Airbus and Boeing are about equal, its Tupolev and Ilyushin that are really losing
#36
Posted 06 November 2016 - 06:06 AM
Always the A330. Always. No questions asked.
No, depends on the case. If the route is within A330 reach then go for it. If its not then 777
In more modern game worlds its A330 or 777 or 747 before A380 come out
#37
Posted 06 November 2016 - 06:08 AM
Replaced my Kingfisher 767 with A330's. Higher revenues even after removing more seats for passenger comfort . And can fly to almost all cities with given range. Lease also cheap compared to performance. And i must say 767-400ER is a disaster! Runway req almsot 10,000 feet! I din know!. Saw only after ordering many! Can fly to only major airports then!
Yup 764 sucks
But 767-300ER is very good
All other 767s are not good
For everything else I will say go for A330
#38
Posted 29 November 2016 - 05:01 AM
the only case where i will use 763ER is when flying ULH routes like lax to dubai during early stages. other than that i will go with a330 but before a330 come out i tend to use a300
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users