Boeing 767-300ER
- Owner: ResidentEVO (View all images and albums)
- Uploaded: Oct 26 2020 01:30 PM
- Views: 1,713
- Album Empire Airways
Med, DET, FlyHighAviator
At it's peak, the 767-300ER was operated in four different variants, from an economy-heavy European domestic configuration, to a Trans-Atlantic, first-class service. This variant is shown in the First Class configuration, with 24 lay-flat beds in First Class, a 24-seat "Dominion Class" in a 2-2-2 configuration, and a 141-seat 2-3-2 coach configuration.
This aircraft, G-BTDD, was built in 1996. It's primary routing was across the Atlantic Ocean to New York, Boston, and Montreal. In the winter months, it served as a destination holiday aircraft, on shorter hauls to the Mediterranean or to far-flung destinations such as Barbados and the Bahamas.
Codesharing with it's Unitedwings partners enabled Empire Airways to reach every corner of the globe, and the 767-300ER was a big part of this reach.
These aircraft were all replaced by 787s starting in 2016, with this airframe, the last in service being retired on July 9th, 2018.
(Is this a BA ripoff? Yes. Is it a shot at BATL? Also yes. Is it all in good fun? I'd like to think so.)
EDITS: Changed the Coat of Arms. Good call on calling me out on that one. Changed the fuselage from plain white to a shade of silver to match the logo on the tail.)
sir i believe that is the British Airways coat of arms
It is. Everything else I could find was way too militaristic. And if this is an alternate reality BA, then it makes sense they’d have one just like it.
I may switch it up, or alter it slightly.
I mean, why ripoff? If your intention was to not give a **** and make it anyways then i guess its understandable. But why not just try to make something unique? This now makes 3 British carriers on AE that more or less adopt the exact same livery scheme. The logo is fine but even more so, could've been used in a better, unique livery. Overall its more of the same. 6/10.Is this a BA ripoff? Yes. Is it a shot at BATL? Also yes. Is it all in good fun? I'd like to think so.
they’d have one just like it.
one just like it, not a straight up copy.
Why couldn't you create something original?
this whole brand gives off mad BOAC vibes tbh
awesome
I mean, why ripoff? If your intention was to not give a **** and make it anyways then i guess its understandable. But why not just try to make something unique? This now makes 3 British carriers on AE that more or less adopt the exact same livery scheme. The logo is fine but even more so, could've been used in a better, unique livery. Overall its more of the same. 6/10.
I feel like a British flag carrier has to have a certain “British”-ness to it. Subtle, understated. No coincidence that all major British airlines look alike on this site.
I feel like a British flag carrier has to have a certain “British”-ness to it. Subtle, understated. No coincidence that all major British airlines look alike on this site.
translation: british culture is boring hence british carriers can be boring and it'll still be valid, making this and past british carriers on this site top tier
translation: british culture is boring hence british carriers can be boring and it'll still be valid, making this and past british carriers on this site top tier
I mean.... yes?
I mean.... yes?
LOL
nice
sir i believe that is the British Airways coat of arms